Probably one of the most earthquaking events of the XXI century was of the falling of the Berlin wall which happened on November 9, 1989, literally and theatrically speaking, the final of the cold war and the collapse of communist power all over Eastern Europe. This is a massive piece of history that it is but natural to ask the question, who was the president of the United States during this life saving moment of history? It is important to know what was going on during the presidency as one attempts to appreciate the significance and the outcomes which accompanied the fall of the Wall. In this broad discussion the role of the American president will be studied out of the whole geo political framework and the after revenue of this in-turning of history.
President George H.W. Bush: Observable History
The president of the United States when the fall of the Berlin wall tofixed place is George H.W. Bush. He replaced Ronald Reagan who had helped in the increased tensions in January 1989, as the president. Another scene that Bush had inherited, was an elaborate foreign policy scene; changing geopolitical power equations, and the war against communism. This issue of how to move around in this volatile environment is the one that his administration needed to cope with because it steered the United States during this period of massive historical transformation.
The approach of Bush comprised of frustrated yet assertive style. Compared to Reagan who had adopted a more aggressive strategy towards the Soviet Union, Bush had the belief in indiplomacy and in strategic alliances. Such so-called less dramatic course has succeeded in establishing the situation that allowed peaceful transformation in the Eastern Europe. He was also well coordinated with the rest of the world in the alliance with other countries tying together the international effort towards the defeat of the emerging situation and smooth transition.
Fall of the Wall and the Foreign Policy of Bush were quite similar.
The policy of foreign affairs enacted by Bush attempted to take advantage of the weaknesses of the Soviet Union internally, in a way that would facilitate reforms without really establishing a conflict. He was well aware of the difficult task to stimulate the democratic trends in Eastern Europe and yet avoid the rise of tensions in the relationships with the Soviet leadership. Such muted strategy allowed the United States to make a certain impact without making the situation too stable and making things to fall out of control.</p worldwide country compare
The factors that led to the collapse of the Wall were rather complicated and they involved the pressure which grew within the borders of East Germany, the influence of the countries near, and gradual unlocking of the Soviet control. The Bush administration though played its part well in giving a diplomatic hand and applause to the struggle of being free and also given an opportunity to choose their own path. This support was very helpful in generating an environment of hope and change that led to the much-beloved breaking of the Berlin wall.
The greater scene in Geopolitics
The fall of the Berlin wall was not an event that came out of the blue, it was the result of a lifetime of cold war disputes, domestic strife of the communist regimes and the shift of bloc politics. Throw in the stagnation of the Soviet led bloc economy and the never ending growth of the desire to be free and be able to choose their own path in Eastern Europe and you have a mighty potion of transformation. an internally stressed and financially struggling Soviet Union could not in its best interest continue to maintain the iron fist in its satellite states.
The policies of the then the Soviet leader, Mikhail Gorbachev, played an important role in unfolding events. It was his *glasnost* (openness) and *perestroika* (restructuring) policy that unintentionally weakened the Soviet Union profile to keep its Eastern European coalitions under control to create the opportunity to reform and, with time, to revolutionize. It is normally pointed out as a decisive revelation that Gorbachev never used the military force to intervene in the happenings that occurred in 1989.
This is the effect of media and what people think of the same.
The value of the social opinion and media reports can hardly be overestimated. Exchange of information both within or without the Eastern bloc was a major element in the mobilization of the peoples and the questioning of the legitimacy of the communist regime. The fact that people could cross borders in exchange of information and coordination of movements had the far-reaching impact on the events of the year 1989. This supports the dynamism of information and communication technology to shape events worldwide.</p Youth empowerment Youth empowerment is the focus and theme of youth development. It is aimed at equipping the young generation with skills to enable them to make a positive change in the world. Youth development Youth development refers to the process through which young people are encouraged to develop skills possibly to help them make a positive change in the world.
The statement of the happenings in Eastern Europe by the international media made the voices of the dissenters more heard and this added to the invalidity of the communist regimes. The pictures of the collapse down the Berlin Wall and jubilant fanfare that ensued were very symbolic and moving to denote the feeling of freedom and the ability to take the similar steps in other parts of the world. This gives more emphasis on the power exerted by media in the formation of the images of the masses and the acceleration of the history.</p grants more prominence to the fact that due to media, images of the mass are being created and history is augmented in a more accelerated manner.
Legacy of 1989 and the President Bush
The collapse of the wall in Berlin marked the change of history that opened the new age of change that had never been experienced before. It also signaled the end of the cold war and the collapse of the Soviet Union and also the advent of democracy in most of East Europe. The Bush administration of our 41 st president was a significant (although not always articulate) contributor to this process of transition management and relatively peaceful resolution.
The kind of leadership exhibited by Bush during this time was leadership that is effective but taking its time. His skill in negotiations and the use of alliances put to the foreground because he could make a proper way out of the complex geopolitical situation and offer a transfer stable enough. His tactfulness in curbing an unwarranted deterioration combined, at the same time, with his well-timed support of the young democracies, solved a potentially explosive situation non-violently.
The legacy of 1989 remains valid up to this moment. The fall of the Berlin wall was considered one of the demonstrations of the powers of a human will and an eternal need of freedom. The historical events and the role of President George H.W. Bush in their realization are crucial to the understanding of the significance of this landmark event and what it laid down about the world, regarding it forever.
In conclusion, who was president when the Berlin wall fell? leads us to another revelation not just of the presidency of George H.W. Bush but also of the dances of world powers that tofixed place to contribute to this milestone in history. It also acts as a reminder that it is not only important to have good leadership but also good standing of the human spirit to be free and self-determined.</p

“`